Design Principles¶
These principles are intended to keep the project grounded when design choices start multiplying.
Core Rules¶
| Principle | What it means in practice |
|---|---|
| Modular | Each treatment function should be swappable without rebuilding the whole machine. |
| Measurable | Every stage needs inlet and outlet observations, not just faith in the component label. |
| Repairable | A field operator should be able to open, clean, and replace common wear items quickly. |
| Honest about limits | If a module only handles turbidity and sediment, document that clearly. |
| Energy-aware | Power budgets matter, especially for remote or solar-backed deployments. |
| Safe by default | Pressure, electricity, UV exposure, and biohazard handling need explicit safeguards. |
Preferred Patterns¶
- clear plumbing runs over tightly packed assemblies
- common voltages and connectors over custom one-off wiring
- sample ports before and after major treatment stages
- consumables that can be sourced from multiple vendors
- documentation that states the source-water scenario up front
Avoid¶
- hidden dependencies between modules
- treatment claims without a validation plan
- filter stacks that are impossible to inspect or clean
- electronics mounted where leaks naturally drain
- ambiguous versioning of mechanical assemblies
Definition of Done¶
A subsystem is ready to share when it has:
- a purpose statement
- a schematic or plumbing map
- a bill of materials or sourcing path
- operating assumptions
- failure modes worth watching
- at least one measurable success criterion
Design Review Questions¶
Before adopting a new concept, answer these directly:
- Which contaminant class is this stage meant to reduce?
- What measurement shows whether it is working?
- What fouls or wears first?
- What does service look like after 50 hours, 200 hours, and one bad day in the field?
- Can a contributor reproduce the design without asking the original builder?